Lucid Motors (LCID) stock was hit with multiple volatility trading halts and crashed more than 40% intraday on July 14, 2026 — one of the worst single-day drops in the company's history — after a report claimed the automaker was weighing Chapter 11 bankruptcy or a take-private deal. Lucid denied it within hours, calling the report "completely false" and pointing to billions in available liquidity. Rival Rivian's stock also dipped on the news as investors reassessed the broader EV-startup landscape.
40%+
Intraday stock drop, triggering two trading halts
$4.7B
Pro forma total liquidity, per Lucid's own figures
-90%
Stock decline since its 2021 SPAC peak near $58
What the Report Claimed
The story came from eletric-vehicles.com, a trade outlet with limited sourcing credibility, building on earlier reporting (already circulating from other outlets) that Lucid had retained restructuring firm AlixPartners. The new claim went further: that AlixPartners had advised Lucid's board to consider strategic options including a take-private transaction or a Chapter 11 filing. That framing — landing on a stock already deep in a multi-year decline — was enough to trigger panic selling within minutes.
Lucid's Denial
Nick Twork, Lucid's head of communications, pushed back publicly and specifically the same day:
"The rumors are completely false. The company has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year, as recently published in its last quarterly filings, and it has not formed any special Board committee to explore the scenarios reported today. Our focus is on improving execution, strengthening operations, and positioning Lucid to realize the full potential of its technology, products, and innovation. AlixPartners is assisting us in that and nothing else and has not recommended bankruptcy to management or the Board."
— Nick Twork, Lucid Motors
Twork's statement confirmed for the first time on the record that Lucid had in fact retained AlixPartners — a detail that had previously rested on outside reporting rather than company acknowledgment. But he was explicit that the firm's mandate is operational, not a prelude to bankruptcy or a sale.